N
← Back to Search
Sponsored

Accelerate Your Clinical Trial Recruitment

Reach thousands of high-intent patients matching your specific inclusion criteria.

Start Campaign
RECRUITING Not applicable ClinicalTrials.gov

Biofeedback Exercises Versus Mulligan Concept on Pain, Mobility, and Posture in Females With Mechanical Neck Pain

Sponsor: Al Hayah University In Cairo • ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT07866040

Registry updated: 2026-10-08
Ad

Recruiting for Similar Conditions?

Sponsors are looking for patients like you. See if you qualify for compensated research studies.

Check Eligibility →

Description

This study compares two physical therapy treatment approaches for females suffering from mechanical neck pain - pain in the neck that comes from the muscles, joints, or soft tissues rather than from nerve damage or disease. Mechanical neck pain is very common and can cause significant pain, stiffness, difficulty moving the head, and problems with daily activities. Fifty adult females aged 18 to 45 years with mechanical neck pain lasting more than 4 weeks will be randomly divided into two equal groups. Group M (25 participants) will receive upper cervical spine manual therapy using the Mulligan mobilization technique, which involves gentle joint movements to restore normal neck joint motion, combined with standard cervical exercises. Group B (25 participants) will receive the same Group M treatment plus biofeedback-guided deep cervical flexor training. This additional exercise uses a pressure sensor placed behind the neck to help the patient learn to activate the deep stabilizing muscles of the neck, which are often weakened in people with neck pain. Both groups will attend 3 treatment sessions per week for 4 consecutive weeks (12 sessions total). Each session lasts approximately 45 minutes. Before each session, all participants receive suboccipital release, myofascial release, and stretching exercises as preparation. The researchers will measure pain intensity, upper cervical flexion range of motion, the flexion-rotation test (which assesses upper neck rotation), the Neck Disability Index (which measures how neck pain affects daily activities), and pressure pain threshold (which measures sensitivity to pressure over neck muscles). All measurements are taken before treatment begins and after the 4-week intervention period. The study aims to determine whether adding biofeedback-guided deep cervical flexor training to the Mulligan manual therapy approach produces greater improvements in pain, neck mobility, disability, and muscle sensitivity compared to the Mulligan approach alone.

Interventions

  • Mulligan Upper Cervical Mobilization (Procedure)
    Manual therapy using low-velocity, high-amplitude mobilization techniques based on the Mulligan concept. Translatoric mobilization movements are applied to restore mobility of the upper cervical joints: occipital-atlas (C0-C1), atlas-axis (C1-C2), and axis-C3 (C2-C3) segments. Techniques are tailored to each patient's clinical findings and follow IFOMPT recommendations. Techniques include upper cervical translatoric dorsal glide (C0-C1), ventral-cranial glide (C2-C3) in supine, and upper cervical translatoric dorsal glide (C1-C2).
  • Conventional Cervical Exercises and Diaphragmatic Breathing (Behavioral)
    Standard cervical exercise program including diaphragmatic breathing exercises. Session preparation includes suboccipital release, myofascial release, and cervical muscle stretching (flexors, lateral flexors, extensors, and rotators 3 repetitions × 30 seconds each side) performed as warm-up and cool-down. Patients are instructed to perform self-treatment home exercises daily (2-5 times per day).
  • Biofeedback-Guided Deep Cervical Flexor Training (Behavioral)
    Deep cervical flexor (DCF) retraining using the Stabilizer Pressure Biofeedback Unit (Chattanooga, TN, USA). Patient positioned in crook lying with the pressure sensor inflated to 30 mmHg beneath the occiput. The patient performs a slow nodding action to progressively target five pressure levels (2 mmHg increments up to 30 mmHg maximum), holding each contraction for 10 seconds with 3-5 second rest intervals. Protocol: 10 repetitions × 3 sets per session, 2-minute rest between sets, 3 days/week for 4 weeks. Exercise progression includes: bilateral DCF contraction in supine, bilateral DCF contraction in standing, unilateral contraction with cervical inclination in supine, unilateral contraction with cervical rotation in supine.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: * Female adults aged 18 to 45 years * Diagnosed with mechanical neck pain (MNP) for more than 4 weeks duration * Able to understand and follow instructions related to physical assessments * No history of cervical spine surgery * Body Mass Index (BMI) between 18.5 and 29.9 kg/m² * Physically active or sedentary individuals, as assessed by baseline physical activity questionnaire * Screened for faulty postural alignment (visual inspection from front, side, and back in relaxed standing, including assessment for forward head posture, rounded shoulders, and asymmetries) * Willing to provide informed consent and participate in all study procedures Exclusion Criteria: * History of systemic diseases affecting musculoskeletal function (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia) * Current pregnancy or postpartum period * Recent trauma or fracture in the cervical or thoracolumbar spine * Use of medications that affect muscle performance or pain perception * Involvement in other physiotherapy or rehabilitation programs during the study period

Conditions

Neck Pain Cervical Spine Dysfunction Forward Head Posture

Locations

  • Badr University — Badr, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
Sponsored

Partner with Nurenyx

Showcase your study to thousands of motivated patients matching your criteria.

Learn More

Official Source

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.

View Official Record