Paclitaxel-Bleomycin/Etoposide/Cisplatin vs Bleomycin/Etoposide/Cisplatin in Poor-prognosis Non-seminomatous Germ Cell Tumors (NSGCT) and Unfavorable Tumor Marker Decline: Randomized Phase II Trial
Sponsor: Blokhin's Russian Cancer Research Center • ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT07847190
Recruiting for Similar Conditions?
Sponsors are looking for patients like you. See if you qualify for compensated research studies.
Check Eligibility →Description
GETUG-13 study has prospectively confirmed poor outcomes in advanced germ cell tumors (GCT) patients with unfavorable decrease of tumor markers after 1 cycle of BEP chemotherapy. There is an unmet medical need to improve outcomes in this subset of patients, however the dose-dense regimen proposed in the above-mentioned trial cannot be implemented in routine clinical practice. T-BEP regimen may have advantage over the traditional BEP regimen as first-line therapy for poor-risk GCT Treatment escalation with T-BEP regimen may be an effective and tolerable therapeutic option for advanced GCT patients with unfavorable tumor markers decline.
Interventions
-
Paclitaxel
(Drug)
Paclitaxel 175 mg/m\^2 IV infusion, Day 1, Q3W for 3 cycles in first line
-
Bleomycin
(Drug)
Bleomycin sulfate 30 mg IV infusion, Days 1,3,5, Q3W for 4 cycles in first line
-
Etoposide
(Drug)
Etoposide 100 mg/m\^2 IV infusion, Days 1-5, Q3W for 4 cycles in first line
-
Cisplatin
(Drug)
Cisplatin 20 mg/m\^2 IV infusion, Days 1-5, Q3W for 4 cycles in first line
-
G-CSF (Filgrastim)
(Drug)
G-CSF 5 mcg/kg subcutaneous, on Day 6, until post-nadir absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1.0 x 10\^9, Q3W for 4 cycles in first line
Eligibility criteria
Conditions
Locations
- N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology — Moscow, Russia
Partner with Nurenyx
Showcase your study to thousands of motivated patients matching your criteria.
Learn MoreOfficial Source
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
View Official Record