Passive Fit of Implant-Supported Frameworks: Digital vs Conventional Impressions
Sponsor: Mansoura University • ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT07778199
Recruiting for Similar Conditions?
Sponsors are looking for patients like you. See if you qualify for compensated research studies.
Check Eligibility →Description
This randomized crossover clinical trial compares the passivity of fit of complete-arch mandibular implant-supported frameworks fabricated using three impression techniques: a non-calibrated splinted digital scan body system (IO-Connect), a Reverse Scan Body (RSB) digital impression technique, and a conventional splinted open-tray impression technique. Eight completely edentulous patients each receiving four mandibular implants will be included. Passivity of fit will be evaluated clinically using the Sheffield one-screw test and radiographically using intraoral periapical radiographs obtained with the parallel technique.
Interventions
-
IO-Connect Digital Impression
(Procedure)
Digital impression of the mandibular arch obtained using IO-Connect non-calibrated splinted scan bodies to fabricate the implant-supported framework for Group I.
-
Reverse Scan Body Digital Impression
(Procedure)
Digital impression obtained using the Reverse Scan Body (RSB) technique, involving extraoral scanning of scan bodies and superimposition with intraoral tissue scans, to fabricate the implant-supported framework for Group II.
-
Conventional Splinted Impression
(Procedure)
Conventional splinted open-tray impression using polyvinyl siloxane material and Type IV dental stone to fabricate the implant-supported framework for Group III.
Eligibility criteria
Conditions
Locations
- Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University — Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt
Partner with Nurenyx
Showcase your study to thousands of motivated patients matching your criteria.
Learn MoreOfficial Source
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
View Official Record