N
← Back to Search
Sponsored

Accelerate Your Clinical Trial Recruitment

Reach thousands of high-intent patients matching your specific inclusion criteria.

Start Campaign
RECRUITING Not applicable ClinicalTrials.gov

A Comparative Study of Erector Spinae Fascia (ESF) Injection and Dry Needling Combined With Functional Rehabilitation (FR) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Who Have Undergone Spinal Surgery (SPIN-NEED)

Sponsor: Clinique de la Côte d'Emeraude • ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT07555496

Registry updated: 2026-09-11
Ad

Recruiting for Similar Conditions?

Sponsors are looking for patients like you. See if you qualify for compensated research studies.

Check Eligibility →

Description

Chronic low back pain represents a major public health issue, with an estimated prevalence of up to 23% in the adult population and a significant impact on quality of life and functional capacity. Among these patients, a significant proportion undergo spinal surgery-including laminectomy, discectomy, or spinal fusion-when conservative treatment has failed to provide adequate relief. Current treatment strategies involve functional spinal rehabilitation (FSR). Due to the multifaceted and complex pathophysiology of this chronic pain condition, we have previously addressed the spinal syndrome in terms of its functional and muscular component: the myofascial expression. In our clinical practice, we have introduced a minimally invasive paravertebral procedure, guided by ultrasound, targeting the fascia of the erector spinae muscles in the lower lumbar region. The goal of this procedure is to provide pain relief to the patient, enabling them to better adhere to the rehabilitative treatment (functional restoration of the spine) and ultimately improve the patient's quality of life within their environment. This evaluation of professional practices highlights a clear clinical indication in favor of infiltration of the erector spinae fascia, with a significant majority of patients reporting improved pain relief and better adherence to rehabilitation. Thus, within a coordinated, multidisciplinary care approach, this intervention appears to address patient expectations regarding comfort and leads us to consider the myofascial component of the complaint. The proposed paravertebral intervention is also appropriate in accordance with the updated recommendations, which are very restrictive in the context of a surgically treated spine (PSPS-2). This assessment of current practices justifies the implementation of a prospective controlled study. Through this study, we aim to investigate the treatment's effects and evaluate its pharmacological (via the anti-inflammatory action of corticosteroids) and mechanical (via needle-induced muscle stimulation) components.

Interventions

  • infiltration of the erector spinae fascia (Procedure)
    Injection of half a vial of Diprostene 1.5 mL + Lidocaine 1.5 mL-under ultrasound guidance-targeting the erector spinae muscles medial to the posterior superior iliac spine-bilaterally
  • Dry needling (Procedure)
    Dry needle insertion guided by ultrasound, with manipulation targeting the spinal erector muscles medial to the posterior superior iliac spine-on both sides.
  • Placebo (Procedure)
    simulated procedure (non-invasive puncture with a stylet in the lower lumbar region, medial to the posterior superior iliac spine-on both sides).

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: * Patient with chronic back pain, with previous surgery Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with specific or common low back pain * Patients receiving posterior subcutaneous spinal cord stimulation * Patients with a life expectancy of less than 12 months * Patients with a contraindication to corticosteroid injections (coagulation disorder) * Pregnant or breastfeeding patients * Patients with cognitive and/or psychobehavioral disorders

Conditions

Back Pain Lower Back Chronic

Locations

  • Emerald Coast Clinic — St-Malo, France
Sponsored

Partner with Nurenyx

Showcase your study to thousands of motivated patients matching your criteria.

Learn More

Official Source

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.

View Official Record