Comparison of Awake Tracheal Intubation Methods
Sponsor: Kocaeli City Hospital • ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT07484841
Recruiting for Similar Conditions?
Sponsors are looking for patients like you. See if you qualify for compensated research studies.
Check Eligibility →Description
The aim of this study was to compare three different awake tracheal intubation technique -fiberoptic bronchoscopy (ATI:FB), videolaryngoscopy (ATI:VL), and fiberoptic bronchoscopy via a supraglottic airway device (ATI:SAD)- in terms of success rates, intubation times, and complications. Additionally, the study aims to evaluate the reliability of the SAD-assisted ATI method and its potential to contribute to the literature.
Interventions
-
Awake tracheal intubation viaFiberoptic Bronchoscopy (ATI:FOB)
(Procedure)
awake tracheal intubation will be perform via FOB
-
Awake tracheal Intubation via videolaryngoscopy (ATI:VL)
(Procedure)
Awake tracheal intubation will be perform via videolaryngoscopy
-
awake tracheal intubation via aintree catheter loaded FOB through supraglottic airway device (ATI:SAD)
(Procedure)
Awake tracheal Intubation will be perform via aintree catheter loaded FOB through supraglottic airway device
Eligibility criteria
Conditions
Locations
- Kocaeli City Hospital — İzmit, Kocaeli, Turkey (Türkiye)
Partner with Nurenyx
Showcase your study to thousands of motivated patients matching your criteria.
Learn MoreOfficial Source
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
View Official Record