Adaptive Versus Non-adaptive Radiotherapy and 2 Bladder Filling Instructions for Patients With Intermediate or High Risk Localized Prostate Cancer (ARP)
Sponsor: Scott Tyldesley • ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06678126
Recruiting for Similar Conditions?
Sponsors are looking for patients like you. See if you qualify for compensated research studies.
Check Eligibility →Description
The study is being done to compare the side effects between two different radiation techniques, standard non-adaptive radiation therapy vs. daily adaptive radiation therapy and also comparing two different bladder filling instructions to find out if customized bladder instructions may lead to better treatment outcomes.
Interventions
-
Prostate and Pelvic Nodes Radiotherapy
(Radiation)
60 Gy prostate and 44 Gy pelvic nodes with 20 fractions
Eligibility criteria
Conditions
Locations
- BC Cancer Vancouver — Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Partner with Nurenyx
Showcase your study to thousands of motivated patients matching your criteria.
Learn MoreOfficial Source
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
View Official Record